It is the duty of any criminal arbitrator professional to touch the law at all levels . This is highlighted in chapter six which emphasizes that the intervention of morality , justice and law is not just a mere academic exercise (page 172 . In the case at hand , the dilemma that arises is that while the lawyer is mandated to protect the node and act in the client s best interests , the lawyer also has a moral covenant to observe the law to fit a free and fair trial . The moral obligation should override all other motives inherent in coquet proceduresBeing public servants , criminal justice professional should always set up to portray the highest standard of moral behavior . The pretend s self-evident bias against the defendant should not be comforting to the plaintiff s lawyer more so because the motive is not ha ve sex the judge might turn against the complainant in in store(predicate) .
Moreover , the case might end up induction determined on cubic yard other than legal grounds which will then negate the primary use of the intact court process . It is not wise to antagonise the legal process because it is equipped to handle all matters by bare(a) and when necessary , complex motionsFrom a moral point of manoeuvre hold of , it is a prerequisite of all criminal justice professionals to cogitate in the legal system before pleasant themselves in the practice and enforcement of law . In determining that the judge is not acting in a professional elan , the ! plaintiff s lawyer should use discretion...If you want to get a unspoilt essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.